Letter to the editor penned by prominent physicians falls on deaf ears

By Therese Bermpohl, Director of the Office for Family Life

Eight doctors, six of them from Virginia, take issue with an article entitled “Contraceptive Choices in Women with Chronic Disease” that appeared in the Sept 15, 2010, edition of American Family Physician because it fails to acknowledge the scientific advances that have been made with regard to natural methods of family planning.  As they put it “not one of the options reviewed by the authors reference any currently available and scientifically validated non-contraceptive natural family planning method, all of which are 100% medically free of side effects.”

Because their letter was not printed in American Family Physician, I post it here in hopes it will encourage women looking for a natural, drug-free alternative, but who may not know they exist:



“In Contraceptive Choices in Women with Underlying Medical Conditions (American Family Physician, Sept. 15, 2010, a journal of the American Academy of Family Physicians), Bonnema et al. discuss what contraceptive options family  physicians can recommend to women with specific chronic medical conditions.  The emphasis in the article is on how physicians can select a contraceptive method that represents a lower medical risk profile for women diagnosed with diabetes, hypertension or lupus, are obese or women who engage in habits like smoking. Unfortunately, not one of the options reviewed by the authors reference any currently available and scientifically validated non-contraceptive natural family planning method, all of which are 100% medically free of side effects.

It is highly probable that the authors of the above article are not dissimilar from most physicians, including Obstetricians and Gynecologists. They likely are unfamiliar with the utility and wide applicability of natural methods of fertility regulation for purposes of avoiding pregnancy, which was established by the multi-center trial of the World Health Organization (WHO) in the 1980’s. WHO defined the umbrella term, natural family planning (NFP), as “methods for planning and preventing pregnancy by observation of the naturally occurring signs and symptoms of the fertile and infertile phases of the menstrual cycle, with the avoidance of intercourse during the fertile phase if pregnancy is to be avoided.”

Fortunately, natural methods of fertility regulation are currently being provided both nationally and internationally in a variety of ambulatory care settings. In the United States, the major methods in use include the Billings Ovulation Method, Creighton Model FertilityCare System, the Sympto-thermal Methods and the Marquette Method.  Modern natural methods are not to be confused with calendar rhythm and are not dependent on the regularity of the woman’s cycle.

In addition, the authors of the above article made no reference to population-based surveys that have demonstrated a significant interest in NFP—about 25% of women are interested in NFP to avoid pregnancy, 33% are interested in NFP to conceive, and about 40% of men are interested as well. This interest is not associated with religion, education, age, or income (Journal of Family Practice 1998; 46: 65-71).

Natural methods have been evaluated in the medical literature (Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 1998, British Medical Journal, 1993, etc.) for their use-effectiveness to avoid pregnancy and have been found to be highly reliable.  Effectiveness data was presented to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services when the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) was updated to include Counseling and instruction in natural family planning to avoid pregnancy (V25.04) and Procreative counseling and advice using natural family planning (V26.41).  An overview presentation “Natural Methods of Family Planning” may be viewed at www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/icd9/att4_NFP_mar06.pdf

In the United States and increasingly in other countries including Ireland, England and Poland,  increasing numbers of family physicians and obstetrician-gynecologists recognize that many hormone-based contraceptive pharmaceuticals and devices such as IUDs  have mechanisms of action that have the potential to interrupt a pregnancy in embryonic development (see Postfertilization Effects of Oral Contraceptives and Their Relationship to Informed Consent, http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/9/2/126).

Physicians trained in natural methods of fertility regulation and in the emerging field of NaProTechnology, frequently observe that women are seeking to enhance their fertility, particularly those who have experienced one or more spontaneous miscarriages or have never been able to achieve a pregnancy. By actively tracking their cycles, natural methods of fertility regulation empower women to be able to recognize gynecologic abnormalities sooner and come to appreciate their fertility as a sign of health, not of a disease.

In order for women in general and women with chronic medical conditions in particular to make an informed decision regarding family planning methods, physicians are ethically bound to provide their female patients with the option of learning effective methods of natural fertility regulation—methods which are free of all medical side effects.

We invite all physicians to develop confidence and competence in recommending a non-contraceptive, natural family planning system by attending an annual meeting of the American Academy of FertilityCare Professionals (see www.aafcp.org) or to contact a local natural family planning center (see www.fertilitycare.orgwww.ccli.orgwww.Boma-usa.orgwww.nfp.marquette.edu).”

Robert F. Conkling, MD, FCP –  Family Medicine and FertilityCare practitioner
P.O Box 7221, Woodbridge, VA
tel:  202-320-8834 email: quovadis.lifecoach@gmail.com

Leslie Chorun, MD, CFCMC, FCP
FertilityCare Medical Consultant and Practitioner
4148 Booth Place #7 Kansas City, Kansas
email: st.lydwina@gmail.com

Karen D. Poehalios, MD, Family Medicine
125 River Bend Dr. Suite 3, Charlottesville, VA
tel: 434-984-4200 email: firstmedfp@yahoo.com

John T. Bruchalski, MD Obstertrics and Gynecology
Tepeyac Family Center 11135 Lee Highway, Fairfax, VA
tel: 703-273-9440 email: jtb@tepeyacfamilycenter.com

Frank Dennehy, MD Family Practice
140 West 11th Street Front Royal, VA
email: fdennehy@valleyhealthlink.com

Theodore F. O’Donnell, MD, CFCMC, Family Practice
100 Highline Drive, East Wenatchee, WA
tel: 509-884-0614 email: todonnell@wvmedical.com

Lorna CVetkovich, MD FACOG (Obstetrics and Gynecology)
Tepeyac Family Center, 11135 Lee Highway, Fairfax, VA
email: lcvetkovich@pol.net

Vivian Lugo-Eschenwald MD, DABFP, Family Medicine Ass. of Alexandria
2000 N. Beauregard Street, Alexandria, VA
tel: 703-370-2400 email: vlugomd@gmail.com

8 thoughts on “Letter to the editor penned by prominent physicians falls on deaf ears

  1. As a woman whose life and health have been completely turned around thanks to the Creighton Model FertilityCare System I can only recommend NFP to all women and couples. Thank you to the office of Family Life for publishing this letter.

  2. We used NFP for 25 years from the time I was 24 years old until I went into menopause at age 46. We had 3 children and then waited 13 years while my husband did his graduate degree, and then we conceived our fourth who just went to college this year. NFP is not only a wonderful method of birth control but helps diagnose women’s health problems. The only trouble is that it is free! So no one knows about it!!!!

  3. My fiance and I only intend to use NFP when we get married. He is in graduate school studying genetics. I am hopefully starting a PhD program in the fall to study neuroscience. He and I have read about how NFP works and it just makes sense. I wish more people would realize this! It’s simple data collection and interpretation. Anyone that has even taken a high school science class in their lives can do it.

    The side effects of contraception are serious. My fiance told me that he had never really had an opinion on the whole matter until he started to realize what they really did and the side effects that can happen. He said he couldn’t handle the idea that his wife might have a blood clot because of a medication that isn’t actually medically necessary.

  4. Thank you for your excellent letter! I am a Creighton model teacher and consultant and can’t agree more.

  5. I concur. I learned the Creighton Model via the NFP Medical Consultant course in 1991-1992. I have helped many couples conceive, and have prevented more than a few miscarriages. People are slow to believe something so risk-free and relatively easy can be so effective. It has certainly improved my marriage, and my practice of the faith as well!. Shame on AFP for not at the very least printing the letter.

  6. My life was also completely changed by Creighton Model FertilityCare System.
    I struggled with chronic migraines for years. Doctor after doctor recommended “the pill” and antidepressants along with a slew of other medications that left me feeling fatigued and numb.
    The unbelievable part was that my neurologist believed my headaches were hormonal, but offered no treatment options other than medications. My OB/GYN office also knew my progesterone levels were low, but stated there was no medical reason to treat a cycling woman with progesterone. When I asked them where I should go, they told me they didn’t know.
    Creighton was the answer. A gift from God. Finally real women’s health solutions!
    Thanks to Creighton I have been headache free for almost 2 years and have been able to address issues with my cycle I didn’t even know existed. Now, instead of trying to suppress my fertility, I feel empowered by it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s